Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Byzantine ChristPerson, Nature, and Will in the Christology of Saint Maximus the Confessor$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Demetrios Bathrellos

Print publication date: 2004

Print ISBN-13: 9780199258642

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: July 2005

DOI: 10.1093/0199258643.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 April 2019

From the Fourth To the Seventh Century

From the Fourth To the Seventh Century

Chapter:
(p.9) 1 From the Fourth To the Seventh Century
Source:
The Byzantine Christ
Author(s):

Demetrios Bathrellos

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199258643.003.0002

Provides the necessary historical and theological background for understanding the monothelite controversy of the 7th century and the Christology of St Maximus the Confessor. It presents the Christological positions of Apollinarianism, Nestorianism, Cyril, and the Council of Chalcedon. It also presents the views of the Council’s critics, and of the Council’s defenders, including John the Grammarian and, in particular, Leontius of Byzantium and Leontius of Jerusalem. It argues that Apollinarism, Nestorianism, and monophysitism put forward unsatisfactory suggestions regarding the doctrine of the person of Christ. By contrast, the Council of Chalcedon (ad 451) put forward a very balanced view of Christ’s unity of person and distinction of natures. The Leontioi, in countering objections to Chalcedon, explained the Chalcedonian distinction between person/hypostasis and nature/essence in detail and in doing so paved the way for Maximus’ Christology. This chapter challenges the view that post-Chalcedonian Christology was strongly asymmetrical and thus undermined the Christological balance achieved by Chalcedon and thus led to the emergence of monothelitism.

Keywords:   anti-Chalcedonian Christology, Apollinarism, Chalcedon, John the Grammarian, Leontius of Byzantium, Leontius of Jerusalem, monophysitism, nature/essence, neo-Chalcedonism, Nestorianism, person/hypostasis

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .