Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Aristotle's De InterpretationeContradiction and Dialectic$

C. W. A. Whitaker

Print publication date: 2002

Print ISBN-13: 9780199254194

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0199254192.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 23 March 2017

(p.221) Bibliography

(p.221) Bibliography

Source:
Aristotle's De Interpretatione
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

The De Interpretatione: Texts and Commentaries

Abaelard, Glossae super Peri Ermenias, in B. Geyer (ed.), Peter Abaelaerds Philosophische Schriften, Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters, vol. 21 pt. 3 (Münster, 1927), 307–503.

Ackrill, J. L., Aristotle's Categories and De Interpretatione (Oxford, 1963).

Albertus Magnus, Libri II Peri Hermenias, in P. Jammy (ed.), Beati Alberti Magni Opera (Lyons, 1651).

Ammonius, In Aristotelis De Interpretatione Commentarius, A. Busse (ed.), Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, iv (Berlin, 1897).

Aquinas, In Aristotelis libros Peri Hermeneias et Posteriorum Analyticorum Expositio, R. M. Spiazzi (ed.) (Rome, 1955).

Arens, H., Aristotle's Theory of Language and its Tradition, Studies in the History of Linguistics, 29 (Amsterdam, 1984).

Bekker, I., Aristotelis Opera, 5 vols. (Berlin, 1831–70).

Boethius, Commentarii in librum Aristotelis Πεϱὶ ἑ̟μηνίας, C. Meiser (ed.) (Leipzig, 1877–80).

Brandis, C. A. (ed.), Scholia in Aristotelem, in I. Bekker and O. Gigon (eds.), Aristotelis Opera, 2nd edn., iv (Berlin, 1961).

Colli, G., Aristotele, Organon: Introduzione, traduzione e note (Turin, 1955).

Dullaert de Gandavo, J., Quaestiones super duos libros Peri Hermenias Aristotelis (Salamanca, 1517).

Minio‐Paluello, L., Aristotelis Categoriae et liber De Interpretatione (Oxford, 1949).

Montanari, E., La sezione linguistica del Peri Hermeneias di Aristotele, 2 vols., Studi e testi, 5 and 8 (Florence, 1988).

Pacius, J., Ἀϱιστοτέλουsigmav Ὄϱγανον (Frankfurt, 1597).

Spondanus, I., Aristotelis Organum Graecolatinum (Basle, 1583).

Tricot, J., Aristote: Organon, 2, De l'Interprétation (Paris, 1989).

Waitz, T., Aristotelis Organon Graece, 2 vols. (Leipzig, 1844).

Weidemann, H., Aristoteles Peri Hermeneias (Berlin, 1994).

Zanatta, M., Aristotele, Dell' Interpretazione: Introduzione, traduzione e commento (Milan, 1992).

(p.222) Zimmermann, F. W., Al‐Farabi's Commentary and Short Treatise on Aristotle's De Interpretatione (Oxford, 1981).

General Bibliography

Ackrill, J. L., Aristotle the Philosopher (Oxford, 1981).

Albritton, R., ‘Present Truth and Future Contingency’, Philosophical Review, 66 (1957), 29–46.

Alexander of Aphrodisias, In Aristotelis Metaphysica Commentaria, M. Hayduck (ed.), Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, i (Berlin, 1891).

Andersen, H. B., and Faye, J., ‘Om Fremtidige Søslag’, Museum Tusculanum, 40–3 (1980), 149–81.

Anscombe, G. E. M., ‘Aristotle and the Sea Battle’, Mind, 65 (1956), 1–15,

repr. in

G. E. M. Anscombe, Collected Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1: From Parmenides to Wittgenstein (Minneapolis, 1981), 44–55.

—— and Geach, P. T., Three Philosophers (Oxford, 1961).

Anton, J. P., Aristotle's Theory of Contrariety (London, 1957).

Apollonius Dyscolus, De Adverbiis, in I. Bekker (ed.), Anecdota Graeca, ii (Berlin, 1816), 527–625.

Apuleius, Peri Hermeneias, in D. Londey and C. Johanson (eds.), The Logic of Apuleius, Philosophia Antiqua, 47 (Leiden, 1987).

Aquinas, De Potentia, in Opera Omnia, 25 vols. (Parma, 1852–73).

Augustine, Retractationum libri duo, P. Knöll (ed.), Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, 36 (Vienna and Leipzig, 1902).

Aune, B., ‘Fatalism and Professor Taylor’, Philosophical Review, 71 (1962), 512–19.

Ax, W., ‘Ψὸφος, φωνή und διάλεϰτος als Grundbegriffe aristotelischer Sprachreflexion’, Glossa, 56 (1978), 245–71.

—— ‘Zum isolierten ̟̔η̑μα in Aristoteles de Interpretatione 16b19–25’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 61 (1979), 271–9.

Barnes, J., ‘The Law of Contradiction’, Philosophical Quarterly, 19 (1969), 302–9.

—— Aristotle : Posterior Analytics (Oxford, 1975; 2nd edn., Oxford, 1994).

—— ‘Peripatetic Negations’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 4 (1986), 201–14.

Battegazzore, A. M., ‘Vincenza Celluprica, Il Capitolo 9 del De Interpretatione di Aristotele: Rassegna di studi 1930–1973’, Maia, 33 (1981), 163–4.

Baylis, C. A., ‘Are Some Propositions neither True nor False?’, Philosophy of Science, 3 (1936), 156–66.

Becker, A., ‘Bestreitet Aristoteles die Gültigkeit des “Tertium non Datur” für Zukunftaussagen?’, Actes du congrès international de philosophie scientifique, Fasc. 6 (Paris, 1936), 69–74.

(p.223) Belardi, W., Il linguaggio nella filosofia di Aristotele (Rome, 1975).

—— ‘Riconsiderando la seconda frase del De interpretatione’, Studi e saggi linguistici, 21 (1981), 79–83.

Berti, E., ‘Quelques remarques sur la conception aristotélicienne du non‐être’, Revue de Philosophie Ancienne, 1 (1983), 115–42.

Bluck, R. S., ‘On the Interpretation of Aristotle, De Interpretatione 12–13’, Classical Quarterly, NS, 13 (1963), 214–22.

Bolton, R., ‘Essentialism and Semantic Theory in Aristotle: Posterior Analytics II 7–10’, Philosophical Review, 85 (1976), 514–44.

Bonitz, H., Aristotelische Studien (Vienna, 1862–7; repr. Hildesheim, 1969).

—— Index Aristotelicus (Berlin, 1870).

Bradley, R. D., ‘Must the Future Be What it is Going to Be?’, Mind, 68 (1959), 193–208.

Brentano, F., On the Several Senses of Being in Aristotle, R. George (tr.) (Berkeley, 1975).

Brunschwig, J., Topiques (Paris, 1967).

Burnyeat, M. F., ‘The Origins of Non‐Deductive Inference’, in J. Barnes, J. Brunschwig, M. Burnyeat, and M. Schofield (eds.), Science and Speculation (Cambridge, 1982), 193–238.

Burrel, D., ‘Aristotle and Future Contingencies’, Philosophical Studies, 13 (1964), 37–52.

Butler, R. J., ‘Aristotle's Sea Fight and Three‐Valued Logic’, Philosophical Review, 64 (1955), 264–74.

Cauquelin, A., Aristote: Le Langage (Paris, 1990).

Celluprica, V., Il capitolo 9 del De Interpretatione di Aristotele: Rassegna di studi 1930–1973, (Bologna, 1977).

—— ‘Logica e semantica nella teoria aristotelica della predicazione’, Phronesis, 32 (1987), 166–87.

di Cesare, D., La semantica nella filosofia greca (Rome, 1980).

Chiesa, C., Symbole et signe dans le De Interpretatione, Cahiers de Philosophie ancienne, no. 5 (Brussels, n.d.).

Code, A., ‘Aristotle's Investigation of a Basic Logical Principle: Which Science Investigates the Principle of Non‐Contradiction?’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 16 (1986), 341–57.

Cohen, S. M., ‘Aristotle on the Principle of Non‐Contradiction’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 16 (1986), 359–70.

Crönert, W., Memoria Graeca Herculanensis (Leipzig, 1903; repr. Hildesheim, 1963).

Dante, De Vulgari Eloquentia, in E. Moore (ed.), Tutte le opere di Dante Alighieri (Oxford, 1904).

Díaz Tejera, A., ‘Tiempo físico y tiempo lingüístico en Aristóteles’, Revista Española de Lingüística, 15 (1985), 37–58.

Dickason, A., ‘Aristotle, the Sea Fight and the Cloud’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 14 (1976), 11–22.

(p.224) Diels, H., and Kranz, W., Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (Berlin, 1951).

Diogenes Laertius, Lives of the Philosophers, R. D. Hicks (ed. and tr.), 2 vols. (London, 1965–6).

Dionysius of Halicarnassus, De Compositione Verborum, in H. Usener and L. Radermacher (eds.), Dionysii Halicarnasei Opuscula, ii (Leipzig, 1904).

Dionysius Thrax, Ars Grammatica, G. Uhlig (ed.) (Leipzig, 1883).

Dmowski, J.‐A., Institutiones Philosophicae, 3 vols. in 1 (Leuven, 1840–1).

Donini, P. L., Ethos: Aristotele e il determinismo (Turin, 1989).

Eco, U., Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language (Bloomington, Ind., 1984).

Engels, J., ‘Origine, sens et survie du terme boécien “secundum placitum” ’, Vivarium, 1 (1963), 87–114.

Fine, G., ‘Truth and Necessity in De Interpretatione 9’, History of Philosophy Quarterly, 1 (1984), 23–47.

van Fraassen, B. C., ‘Singular Terms, Truth Value Gaps and Free Logic’, Journal of Philosophy, 63 (1966), 481–95.

Frede, D., Aristoteles und die Seeschlacht: Das Problem der Contingentia Futura in De Int. 9, Hypomnenata, 27 (Göttingen, 1970).

—— ‘The Sea‐Battle Reconsidered: A Defence of the Traditional Interpretation’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 3 (1985), 31–87.

Frege, G., ‘Negation’, in P. Geach and M. Black (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (Oxford, 1960).

Furth, M., ‘A Note on Aristotle's Principle of Non‐Contradiction’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 16 (1986), 371–81.

Gale, R. M., ‘Tensed Statements’, Philosophical Quarterly, 12 (1962), 53–9.

Graffi, G., ‘Una nota sui concetti di ̟̔η̑μα e λόγος in Aristotele’, Athenaeum, 44 (1986), 91–101.

Grant, C. K., ‘Certainty, Necessity and Aristotle's Sea Battle’, Mind, 66 (1957), 522–31.

Harvey, P., ‘Aristotle on Truth and Falsity in De An. III 6’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 16 (1978), 219–20.

Hintikka, K. J. J., ‘Necessity, Universality and Time in Aristotle’, Ajatus, 20 (1957), 65–90,

repr. in

J. Barnes, M. Schofield, and R. Sorabji (eds.), Articles on Aristotle, iii (London, 1979), 108–24.

—— ‘On the Interpretation of De Interpretatione XII–XIII’, Acta Philosophica Fennica, 14 (1962), 5–22.

—— ‘The Once and Future Sea Fight: Aristotle's Discussion of Future Contingents in De Interpretatione IX’, Philosophical Review, 73 (1964), 461–92.

—— Time and Necessity (Oxford, 1973).

Irwin, T. H., ‘Aristotle's Discovery of Metaphysics’, Review of Metaphysics, 31 (1977), 210–29.

(p.225) —— ‘Aristotle's Concept of Signification’, in M. Schofield and M. Nussbaum (eds.), Language and Logos (Cambridge, 1982), 241–66.

—— Aristotle's First Principles (Oxford, 1988).

Judson, L., ‘La Bataille navale d'aujourd'hui: De Interpretatione 9’, Revue de Philosophie Ancienne, 6 (1988), 5–37.

Kirwan, C., Aristotle's Metaphysics : Books Γ, Δ, and E (Oxford, 1971).

Kneale, W., and Kneale, M., The Development of Logic (Oxford, 1962).

Kretzmann, N., ‘Aristotle on Spoken Sounds Significant by Convention’, in J. Corcoran (ed.), Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretation (Dordrecht, 1974), 3–21.

Larkin, M. T., Language in the Philosophy of Aristotle (The Hague, 1971).

Lear, J., Aristotle and Logical Theory (Cambridge, 1980).

—— Aristotle: The Desire to Understand (Cambridge, 1988).

Lenz, J. W., ‘Looking Back at the “Sea Fight Tomorrow” ’, Journal of Philosophy, 54 (1957), 773–4.

Linsky, L., ‘Professor Donald Williams on Aristotle’, Philosophical Review 63 (1954), 250–2.

Littleton, A., Linguae Latinae Liber Dictionarius Quadripartitus (London, 1677).

Lo Piparo, F., ‘Aristotle: The Material Conditions of Linguistic Expressiveness’, Versus: Quaderni di studi semiotici, no. 50–1 (May–Dec. 1988), 83–102.

Lowe, M. F., ‘Aristotle on the Sea‐Battle: A Clarification’, Analysis, 40 (1980), 55–9.

Lukasiewicz, J., Aristotle's Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic (Oxford, 1951).

—— ‘On the Notion of Possibility’, ‘On Three‐Valued Logic’, ‘On Determinism’, ‘Philosophical Remarks on Many‐Valued Systems of Propositional Logic’, in S. McCall (ed.), Polish Logic 1920–1939 (Oxford, 1967), 15–65.

—— ‘Aristotle on the Law of Contradiction’, in J. Barnes, M. Schofield, and R. Sorabji (eds.), Articles on Aristotle, iii (London, 1979), 50–62.

McCall, S., ‘Temporal Flux’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 3 (1966), 270–81.

McKim, V. R., ‘Fatalism and the Future: Aristotle's Way Out’, Review of Metaphysics, 25 (1971), 80–111.

Manetti, G., Le teorie del segno nell'antichità classica (Milan, 1987).

Minio‐Paluello, L., ‘Aristotele, Organon: Introduzione, traduzione e note di Giorgio Colli’, Giornale critico della filosofia italiana, 3rd ser., 10 (1956), 251–61.

Montague, R., ‘Mr. Bradley on the Future’, Mind, 69 (1960), 550–4.

Moreau, J., ‘Aristote et la vérité antéprédicative’, in S. Mansion (ed.), Aristote et les problèmes de méthode: Communications présentées au Symposium Aristotelicum 1960 (Leuven, 1961), 21–33.

(p.226) Noonan, H., ‘An Argument of Aristotle on Non‐Contradiction’, Analysis, 37 (1976–7), 163–9.

Nuchelmans, G., Theories of the Proposition: Ancient and Medieval Conceptions of the Bearers of Truth and Falsity (Amsterdam, 1973).

Owen, G. E. L., ‘Tithenai ta phainomena’, in S. Mansion (ed.), Aristote et les problèmes de méthode: Communications présentées au Symposium Aristotelicum 1960 (Leuven, 1961), 83–103,

repr. in G. E. L. Owen, Logic, Science and Dialectic (London, 1986), 239–51.

—— ‘Aristotle and the Snares of Ontology’, in J. R. Bambrough (ed.), New Essays on Plato and Aristotle (London, 1965), 69–75,

repr. in G. E. L. Owen, Logic, Science and Dialectic (London, 1986), 259–78.

—— ‘Particular and General’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 79 (1978–9), 1–21,

repr. in G. E. L. Owen, Logic, Science and Dialectic (London, 1986), 279–94.

Pépin, J., ‘Σὸμβολα, Σημει̑α, ‘Ομοώματ: A propos de De Interpretatione 1, 16a3–8 et Politique VIII 5, 1340a6–39’, in J. Wiesner (ed.), Aristoteles: Werk und Wirkung, i (Berlin, 1985), 22–44.

Pinborg, J., ‘Classical Antiquity: Greece’, in Historiography of Linguistics, Current Trends in Linguistics, 13 (The Hague, 1975), 69–126.

Plutarch, Platonicae Quaestiones, in C. Hubert and H. Drexler (eds.), Moralia, vol. 6, Fasc. 1 (Leipzig, 1959).

Prior, A. N., ‘Three‐Valued Logic and Future Contingents’, Philosophical Quarterly, 3 (1953), 317–26.

—— Time and Modality (Oxford, 1957).

—— Past, Present and Future (Oxford, 1967).

Quine, W. V., ‘On a So‐called Paradox’, Mind, 62 (1953), 65–7.

Ramus, P., The Logike (London, 1574).

Rescher, N., ‘An Interpretation of Aristotle's Doctrine of Future Contingency and Excluded Middle’, in N. Rescher, Studies in the History of Arabic Logic (Pittsburgh, 1963), 43–54.

Riondato, E., La teoria aristotelica dell'enunciazione (Padua, 1957).

Ritter, H., and Preller, L., Historia Philosophiae Graecae et Romanae ex fontium locis contexta, 6th edn., G. Teichmueller (ed.) (Göttingen, 1878).

Ross, W. D., Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics (Oxford, 1949).

—— Aristotelis Fragmenta Selecta (Oxford, 1955).

Rossito, C., ‘Opposizione e non contraddizione nella Metafisica di Aristotele’, in E. Berti (ed.), La contraddizione (Rome, 1977), 43–69.

Ryle, G., ‘“It Was To Be” ’, in G. Ryle, Dilemmas (Cambridge, 1954), 15–35.

—— ‘Dialectic in the Academy’, in J. R. Bambrough (ed.), New Essays on Plato and Aristotle (London, 1965).

Sainati, V., Storia dell'Organon aristotelico. Vol. 1: Dai Topici al De interpretatione (Florence, 1968).

(p.227) Saunders, J. T., ‘A Sea Fight Tomorrow?’, Philosophical Review, 67 (1958), 367–78.

Sextus Empiricus, Adversus Mathematicos, in H. Mutschmann and J. Mau (eds.), Sextii Empirici Opera, iii (Leipzig, 1959).

Sharvy, R., ‘Tautology and Fatalism’, Journal of Philosophy, 61 (1964), 293–5.

Sillitti, G., ‘Il non ente fra Platone e Aristotele’, La Cultura, 6 (1968), 474–88.

—— Tragelaphos, Elenchos, 2 (Naples, 1980).

Sorabji, R., Necessity, Cause and Blame (London, 1978).

Steinthal, H., Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern (Berlin, 1863).

Strang, C., ‘Aristotle and the Sea Battle’, Mind, 69 (1960), 447–65.

Swift, J., Travels into Several Remote Nations of the World, by Lemuel Gulliver, (London, 1766).

Talanga, J., Zukunftsurteile und Fatum: Eine Untersuchung über Aristoteles' De Interpretatione 9 und Ciceros De Fato, mit einem Überblick über die spätantiken Heimarmene‐Lehren (Bonn, 1986).

Taylor, R., ‘The Problem of Future Contingencies’, Philosophical Review, 66 (1957), 1–28.

—— ‘Fatalism’, Philosophical Review, 71 (1962), 56–66.

—— ‘A Note on Fatalism’, Philosophical Review, 72 (1963), 497–9.

Trendelenburg, F. A., Aristotelis De Anima libri tres (Jena, 1833).

—— Elementa Logices Aristotelicae (Berlin, 1836).

Urráburu, J. J., Compendium Philosophiae Scholasticae, 2 vols. (Madrid, 1902).

Varro, De Lingua Latina, G. Goetz and F. Schoell (eds.) (Leipzig, 1910).

Vuillemin, J., ‘Le chapitre IX du De Interpretatione’, Philosophiques, 10 (1983), 15–52.

Wagner, H., ‘Aristoteles, De Interpretatione 3 16b19–25’, in R. B. Palmer (ed.), Philomathes: Studies and Essays in the Humanities in Memory of Philip Merlan (The Hague, 1971), 95–115.

Waterlow, S., Passage and Possibility: A Study of Aristotle's Modal Concepts (Oxford, 1982).

Weidemann, H., ‘Ansätze zu einer semantischen Theorie bei Aristoteles’, Zeitschrift für Semiotik, 4 (1982), 241–57.

—— ‘Aristoteles über das isolierte Aussagewort, de Int. 3 16b19–25’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 64 (1982), 239–56.

—— ‘Textkritische Bemerkungen zum siebten Kapitel der aristotelischen Hermeneutik: Int. 7, 17b12–16/16–20’, in J. Wiesner (ed.), Aristoteles: Werk und Wirkung, i (Berlin, 1985), 45–56.

—— ‘Grundzüge der aristotelischen Sprachtheorie’, in P. Schmitter (ed.), Sprachtheorien der abendländischen Antike (Tübingen, 1991), 170–92.

(p.228) Wieland, W., Die aristotelische Physik (Göttingen, 1972).

Williams, C. J. F., ‘True Tomorrow, Never True Today’, Philosophical Quarterly, 28 (1978), 285–99.

—— ‘What is, Necessarily is, When it is’, Analysis, 40 (1980), 127–31.

Williams, D. C., ‘The Sea Fight Tomorrow’, in P. Henle, H. M. Kallen, and S. K. Langer (eds.), Structure, Method and Meaning (New York, 1951), 282–306.

—— ‘Professor Linsky on Aristotle’, Philosophical Review, 63 (1954), 253–5.

Wittgenstein, L., Tractatus Logico‐Philosophicus, D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness (trs.) (London, 1961; 1st pub. 1921).

Wolff, P., ‘Truth, Futurity and Contingency’, Mind, 69 (1960), 398–402.

Zadro, A., Tempo ed enunciati nel De Interpretatione di Aristotele (Padua, 1979).

Zirin, R. A., ‘Inarticulate Noises’, in J. Corcoran (ed.), Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretation (Reidel and Dordrecht, 1974), 23–5.

—— ‘Aristotle's Biology of Language’, Transactions of the American Philological Association, 110 (1980), 325–47.