Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Susanne Bobzien

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780199247677

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0199247676.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 17 August 2018

Two Chrysippean Arguments for Causal Determinism

Two Chrysippean Arguments for Causal Determinism

Chapter:
(p.59) 2 Two Chrysippean Arguments for Causal Determinism
Source:
Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy
Author(s):

Susanne Bobzien (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0199247676.003.0003

Central passages: Cicero On Fate 20–21, 26–28, 37, On Divination I 125–6. The first argument: Chrysippus assumes as true a weak, non‐modal form of logical determinism (if p obtains at t, then for all t’ earlier than t it is true at t’ that p will obtain at t). From this assumption he argues for the truth of his theory of causal determinism, by showing that the latter is a necessary condition of the former. This argument differs considerably from the argument for the truth of future propositions to their necessity (related to the Mower Argument), which Epicurus is said to have attacked. Cicero confuses the two. The second argument: Chrysippus, as most Stoics, believed in divination as a science. He construes an argument from the existence of this science to his type of causal determinism by showing that causal determinism is a necessary condition for the existence of the science of divination.

Keywords:   causal determinism, Chrysippus, Cicero, divination, Epicurus, logical determinism, Mower Argument

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .