Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Facing Facts$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Stephen Neale

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780199247158

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0199247153.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 20 October 2018

Gödel: Facts and Descriptions

Gödel: Facts and Descriptions

(p.118) 5 Gödel: Facts and Descriptions
Facing Facts

Stephen Neale (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

Sets out Kurt Gödel's slingshot (collapsing) argument. The original argument—or, at least, the premisses of the argument that Neale attributes to Gödel—can be found in a fleeting footnote to a discussion of the relationship between Bertrand Russell's Theory of Descriptions and Theory of Facts. Usually each theory is viewed as quite independent of the other, but Gödel argues otherwise: that the viability of the latter depends upon the viability of the former (or at least upon the viability of some non‐referential theory of descriptions). Neale summarizes Gödel's standpoint as follows: ‘if a true sentence stands for a fact, then in order to avoid the collapse of all facts into one, the friend of facts must give up either (a) an intuitive and straightforward Fregean Principle of Composition or (b) the idea that definite descriptions are expressions that purport to stand for things.’ The sections of the chapter are: Elimination (linguistic and ontological); Facts and Descriptions; Identities in the Matrix; and The Eleatic One (the collapse of all facts into one).

Keywords:   collapse of facts, collapsing arguments, Descriptions, Elimination, Facts, Kurt Gödel, Bertrand Russell, Russell's Theory of Descriptions, Russell's Theory of Facts, slingshot arguments, Theory of Descriptions, Theory of Facts

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .