Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The New Politics of Inequality in Latin AmericaRethinking Participation and Representation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Douglas A. Chalmers, Carlos M. Vilas, Katherine Hite, Scott B. Martin, Kerianne Piester, and Monique Segarra

Print publication date: 1997

Print ISBN-13: 9780198781837

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0198781830.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 22 July 2018

The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico

The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico

Chapter:
(p.391) 16 The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico
Source:
The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America
Author(s):

Jonathan Fox (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0198781830.003.0016

Democracy requires elections, but elections do not always guarantee the organizational autonomy that citizenship requires. Clientelism stands in opposition to autonomy, and its change from an authoritarian form, where compliance is gained by threats of coercion, goes through many stages before arriving at full autonomy for groups. This study examines a series of three Mexican rural development programmes from the mid 1970s through the 1980s, with an emphasis on the rural Solidarity funds. These show change, but many obstacles, yielding a new form of popular linkage to politics, here called semi‐clientelism, distinctive because compliance is gained by the threat of withholding benefits rather than coercion, while organizations still have no right to autonomy. As a result of bargaining among three key actors, social movements, authoritarian elites, and reformist state managers, voters are less coerced, but still limited.

Keywords:   clientelism, coercion, Mexican rural politics, organizational autonomy, reformist state managers, semi‐clientelism, social movements

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .