Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The New Politics of Inequality in Latin AmericaRethinking Participation and Representation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Douglas A. Chalmers, Carlos M. Vilas, Katherine Hite, Scott B. Martin, Kerianne Piester, and Monique Segarra

Print publication date: 1997

Print ISBN-13: 9780198781837

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0198781830.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 18 July 2018

Putting Conservatism to Good Use? Long Crisis and Vetoed Alternatives in Uruguay

Putting Conservatism to Good Use? Long Crisis and Vetoed Alternatives in Uruguay

Chapter:
(p.360) 15 Putting Conservatism to Good Use? Long Crisis and Vetoed Alternatives in Uruguay
Source:
The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America
Author(s):

Fernando Filgueira

Jorge Papadópulos

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0198781830.003.0015

Uruguay was able to resist many aspects of neo‐liberal reform that took hold in Latin America in the 1970s and 1980s, despite economic crises, a fundamental change of Uruguay's position in the international market, and pressures from international financial institutions. By examining the limited change in social security, the patterns of labour organization and negotiation, and finally the limits on privatization of public enterprises, it shows how political factors, more than economic or social ones, brought about resistance to those changes, and a more egalitarian response than in other countries. Uruguay's institutionalized pattern of political incorporation allowed new popular actors to effectively participate, and the consensus styles of leadership built on clientelistic parties‐forced changes limited the sharpening income divisions common in other countries. The experience poses the question of whether Uruguay is an outlier or a possible alternative path.

Keywords:   labour negotiations, labour organization, neo‐liberal reforms, party systems, political institutions, privatization, social security

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .