Theories of Growth
There is a vast theoretical and empirical literature on the determinants of economic growth. This literature is critically assessed in this chapter. It looks at theories that focus on initial conditions, the scope for catch‐up, physical investment, human capital formation and innovation in turn, and concludes that attempts to separate out the influence of these factors using neo‐classical growth‐accounting frameworks are unconvincing. As Kaldor pointed out many years ago, we cannot distinguish between a shift in the production function and a movement along it; we need to recognize the complexity of the growth process and the inter‐dependence of causal factors. A mono‐casual theory must necessarily be incomplete as an explanation of Chinese economic growth.
Keywords: catch‐up, innovation, investment, Kaldor, literature, neo‐classical, theory
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .