Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
European Integration After AmsterdamInstitutional Dynamics and Prospects for Democracy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Karlheinz Neunreither and Antje Wiener

Print publication date: 2000

Print ISBN-13: 9780198296409

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0198296401.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2019. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 26 March 2019

East of Amsterdam: The Implications of the Amsterdam Treaty for Eastern Enlargement

East of Amsterdam: The Implications of the Amsterdam Treaty for Eastern Enlargement

Chapter:
(p.218) 12 East of Amsterdam: The Implications of the Amsterdam Treaty for Eastern Enlargement
Source:
European Integration After Amsterdam
Author(s):

Ulrich Sedelmeier

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0198296401.003.0012

Despite the member states’ failure to agree in the Amsterdam Treaty on institutional reforms that they presented before the 1996/7 IGC as prerequisites for enlargement, we should not expect the enlargement process to come to a standstill. The inability to agree on necessary reforms does indeed highlight the EU's difficulties of finding a response to the various adjustment pressures that would not threaten some member states’ material interests. However, there are countervailing dynamics underpinning the enlargement process that appear sufficiently strong to continue to carry the process forward. These dynamics are not easily captured in materialist rationalist analyses: the EU's self‐image or collective identity in its relations with the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEECs) inclines EU policy‐makers towards accommodating these countries’ preferences to join. However, the impact of this identity is uneven among different groups of EU policy‐makers. Thus, while we should expect the enlargement process to continue despite countervailing material interests, the accommodation of the CEECs’ preferences in substantive sectoral policies will vary and will be limited in most issue areas.

Keywords:   adjustment, Amsterdam Treaty, Central Europe, Eastern Europe, enlargement, European Union, identity, intergovernmental conference, member states, policy‐makers

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .