Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Light of the SoulTheories of Ideas in Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes$

Nicholas Jolley

Print publication date: 1998

Print ISBN-13: 9780198238195

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/0198238193.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2017. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: null; date: 26 February 2017

(p.203) Bibliography

(p.203) Bibliography

Source:
The Light of the Soul
Publisher:
Oxford University Press

Bibliography references:

Note: works cited in the Abbreviations list are not included.

Adams, R. M., ‘Where Do our Ideas Come from?’, in S. Stich (ed.), Innate Ideas, (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1975), 71–87.

—— ‘Phenomenalism and Corporeal Substance in Leibniz’, in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, and H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on the History of Philosophy (Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 8; 1983), 217–57.

Anscombe, G. E. M., ‘Times, Beginnings, and Causes’, in Kenny (ed.), Rationalism, Empiricism, and Idealism, pp. 86–103.

Arnauld, A., Des vraies et des fausses idées, in Œuvres de Messire Antoine Arnauld, xxxviii (Paris, 1780; repr. Brussels, 1967).

Ayers, M. R., ‘Mechanism, Superaddition and the Proofs of God's Existence in Locke's Essay’, Philosophical Review, 90 (1981), 210–51.

Bennett, J., Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes (Oxford, 1971).

—— ‘Locke, Leibniz, and the Third Realm’, unpublished paper read to a conference on Locke and Leibniz, Rice University, Nov. 1982.

—— A Study of Spinoza's Ethics (Cambridge, 1984).

Berkeley, G., Philosophical Writings, ed. D. M. Armstrong (New York and London, 1965).

—— Philosophical Works, ed. M. R. Ayers (London, 1975).

Bréhier, E., ‘The Creation of the Eternal Truths in Descartes's System’, in Doney (ed.), Descartes: A Collection of Critical Essays, pp. 192–208.

Broad, C. D., Leibniz: An Introduction (Cambridge, 1975).

Butler, R. J. (ed.), Cartesian Studies (New York, 1972).

Chappell, V., ‘The Theory of Ideas’, in Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes's Meditations, pp. 177–98.

Church, R. W., A Study in the Philosophy of Malebranche (London, 1931).

Cook, M., ‘Arnauld's Alleged Representationalism’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 12 (1974), 53–62.

Cottingham, J., Descartes (Oxford, 1986).

Craig, E., The Mind of God and the Works of Man (Oxford, 1988).

Cranston, M., John Locke: A Biography (London, 1957).

Curley, E. M., ‘Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths’, Philosophical Review, 93 (1984), 569–97.

Davidson, D., Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford, 1980).

Doney, W. (ed.), Descartes: A Collection of Critical Essays (London, 1967).

—— ‘Malebranche’, in Edwards (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, v, 140–3.

(p.204) —— ‘Rationalism’, in H. Robinson (ed.), The Rationalist Conception of Consciousness, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 21, suppl. (1983), 1–14.

Edwards, P. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (8 vols., New York, 1967).

Foucher, S., Critique de la recherche de la vérité (Paris, 1675).

Frankfurt, H., ‘Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths’, Philosophical Review, 86 (1977), 36–57.

Gouhier, H., La Philosophie de Malebranche et son expérience religieuse (Paris, 1948).

Gueroult, M., Malebranche (3 vols., Paris, 1955–9).

Hacking, I., Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? (Cambridge, 1975).

—— ‘Leibniz and Descartes: Proof and Eternal Truths’, in Kenny (ed.), Rationalism, Empiricism, and Idealism, pp. 47–60.

Hatfield, G., and Epstein, W., ‘The Sensory Core and the Medieval Foundations of Early Modern Perceptual Theory’, Isis, 70 (1979), 363–84.

Hobbes, T., Leviathan (1651), ed. C. B. MacPherson (Harmondsworth, 1968).

Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–40), ed. L. A. Selby‐Bigge (Oxford, 1960).

Jolley, N., ‘An Unpublished Leibniz MS on Metaphysics’, Studia Leibnitiana, 7 (1975), 161–89.

—— Leibniz and Locke: A Study of the New Essays on Human Understanding (Oxford, 1984).

—— ‘Leibniz and Malebranche on Innate Ideas’, Philosophical Review, 97 (1988), 71–91.

Kant, I., Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1781), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. N. Kemp Smith (London, 1929).

Kenny, A., Descartes: A Study of his Philosophy (New York, 1968).

—— (ed.), Rationalism, Empiricism, and Idealism (Oxford, 1986).

Kulstad, M., ‘Leibniz's Conception of Expression’, Studia Leibnitiana, 9 (1977), 55–76.

—— ‘Leibniz's Theory of Innate Ideas in the New Essays’, unpublished paper read to the APA Pacific Division, Long Beach, Mar. 1984.

Locke, J., Works (10 vols., London, 1823; repr. Scientia Verlag Aalen, 1963).

—— An Essay concerning Human Understanding (1690), ed. A. D. Woozley (London, 1964).

—— Correspondence of John Locke, ed. E. S. de Beer, vols. iv and v (Oxford, 1979).

Loeb, L. E., From Descartes to Hume: Continental Metaphysics and the Development of Modern Philosophy (Ithaca and London, 1981). (p.205)

Lovejoy, A. O., ‘ “Representative Ideas” in Malebranche and Arnauld’, Mind, 32 (1923), 449–61.

McCracken, C. J., Malebranche and British Philosophy (Oxford, 1983).

Mackie, J. L., Problems from Locke (Oxford, 1976).

McRae, R., ‘ “Idea” as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth Century’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 26 (1965), 175–90.

—— ‘Innate Ideas’, in R. J. Butler (ed.), Cartesian Studies (New York, 1972).

—— Leibniz: Perception, Apperception, and Thought (Toronto, 1976).

Mates, B., The Philosophy of Leibniz: Metaphysics and Language (Oxford, 1986).

Matthews, E., ‘Locke, Malebranche and the Representative Theory’, in I. Tipton (ed.), Locke on Human Understanding (Oxford, 1977), 55–61.

Mellor, D. H., ‘In Defense of Dispositions’, Philosophical Review, 83 (1974), 157–81.

Nadler, S., Arnauld and the Cartesian Philosophy of Ideas, Princeton, 1989.

Radner, D., ‘Spinoza's Theory of Ideas’, Philosophical Review, 80 (1971), 338–59.

—— ‘Representationalism in Arnauld's Act Theory of Perception’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 14 (1976), 96–8.

—— Malebranche (Assen, 1978).

Rée, J., Descartes (London, 1974).

Reid, T., Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man (1785), ed. A. D. Woozley (London, 1941).

Richardson, R. C., ‘The “Scandal” of Cartesian Interactionism’, Mind, 91 (1982), 20–37.

Rorty, A. (ed.), Essays on Descartes's Meditations (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1986).

Rorty, R., Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, 1979).

Russell, B., A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz, (2nd edn., London, 1937).

Ryle, G., The Concept of Mind (London, 1949).

Spinoza, B., Ethica (1677), The Ethics and Selected Letters, trans. S. Shirley, ed. S. Feldman (Indianapolis, 1982).

Stich, S. (ed.), Innate Ideas (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1975).

Vendler, Z., The Matter of Minds (Oxford, 1984).

Warnock, G. J., Berkeley (Harmondsworth, 1953).

Watson, R. A., The Downfall of Cartesianism 1673–1712 (The Hague, 1966).

Williams, B., Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry (Hassocks, 1978).

Wilson, M. D., ‘Leibniz and Materialism’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 3 (1974), 495–513.

(p.206) —— Descartes (London, 1978).

—— ‘Skepticism without Indubitability’, Journal of Philosophy, 81 (1984), 537–44.

Woolhouse, R. S., ‘Leibniz's Reaction to Cartesian Interactionism’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 86 (1985–6), 69–82.

Yolton, J. W., Perceptual Acquaintance from Descartes to Reid (Minneapolis, 1984).