Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Science, Religion, and the Human Experience$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

James D. Proctor

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780195175325

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: February 2006

DOI: 10.1093/0195175328.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 15 November 2018

The Depths and Shallows of Experience

The Depths and Shallows of Experience

Chapter:
(p.71) 4 The Depths and Shallows of Experience
Source:
Science, Religion, and the Human Experience
Author(s):

Hilary Putnam

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/0195175328.003.0005

This essay focuses on the dimension of human experience; Putnam seeks to dispense the shallow notion of experience (including, but not limited to, religious experience) as something utterly reduced to sensations. He does so by carefully comparing the shallow Humean conception of experience, based on impressions or “pictures” formed on the senses, and the Kantian conception which combines perception and conceptual ideas in a continuous self which fuses these experiences over time. Putnam then extends this Kantian notion of experience to discuss Kant’s aesthetic argument concerning “indeterminate concepts,” those that both involve and extend the creative imagination. Putnam applies Kant’s treatment of indeterminacy to morality as a means of suggesting its relevance to religious experience, and also extends this notion to science, arguing that the technological and aesthetic process of scientific knowledge production is far more complex than a sense-data view would suggest. Putnam then returns to religious experience, specifically the problem of skepticism which may seem to result from a rejection of immediate sense-impression and embrace of indeterminacy. He discusses several responses, ultimately siding with the existentialist approach which stresses responsibility to live (and hence make choices) in spite of what cannot be fully proven following “reasonable” means. He concludes by noting the symmetry between atheists and fundamentalist fanatics, since for both, religious belief or nonbelief is obvious. This obviousness in his mind betrays a simplistic notion of experience, again pointing to the centrality of rethinking human experience prior to deep consideration of science and religion.

Keywords:   experience, Hume, indeterminacy, Kant, morality, religion, science, sensations

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .