Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The Indispensability of Mathematics$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Mark Colyvan

Print publication date: 2001

Print ISBN-13: 9780195137545

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/019513754X.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 19 July 2018

Conclusion

Conclusion

Chapter:
(p.141) 7 Conclusion
Source:
The Indispensability of Mathematics
Author(s):

Mark Colyvan

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/019513754X.003.0007

The varieties of mathematical realism that are consistent with the indispensability argument are outlined. It is shown that the argument is silent on many issues such as whether numbers are sets, and whether mathematical entities are causally inert or not. Paul Benacerraf's two objections to mathematical realism are also considered. Finally, the use of indispensability arguments outside the philosophy of mathematics is considered, and, in particular, an indispensability argument for modal realism is discussed.

Keywords:   Benacerraf, mathematical entities, mathematical realism, modal realism, numbers, sets

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .