Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Fragile States$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Wim Naudé, Amelia U. Santos-Paulino, and Mark McGillivray

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199693153

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2012

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693153.001.0001

The Causes and Measurement of State Fragility

Chapter:
(p.43) 3 The Causes and Measurement of State Fragility
Source:
Fragile States
Author(s):

David Carment

Stewart Prest

Yiagadeesen Samy

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693153.003.0003

This chapter is derived from our ongoing research on fragile states funded by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) to help policy-makers and analysts make decisions on where and how to allocate aid, especially in fragile state environments. In order for development assistance to have a measurable and positive impact on fragile states, it is necessary to understand both how and why they become fragile. First, we reconceptualize the meaning of state fragility with equal attention given to the authority, legitimacy and capacity of a state, collectively referred to as authority, legitimacy, and capacity (ALC). Measures of these ALC components corresponding to six different categories of state performance—economics, governance, security and crime, human development, demographics, and the environment—are collected for all countries for the period 1999-2005. Initial testing of our fragility index shows that fragility is driven by a number of factors, of which the level of development seems to be more important. We complement this analysis by examining state fragility using the ALC framework. Overall, the approach presented has the distinct advantage of identifying country-specific patterns of fragility while at the same time allowing for broad strategically relevant measures of comparative performance that can be of use to policy-makers regarding allocation of aid at the sectoral and programming level. Notwithstanding the fact that aid may be allocated for political and strategic reasons, and that fragile states are under funded, we argue that aid that does flow to fragile states could be better targeted. Specifically, it could strengthen the underlying determinants of fragility by addressing fragile states’ distinct and country-specific weaknesses in authority, legitimacy and capacity. Finally, we discuss policy implications of our analysis and directions for future research.

Keywords:   foreign aid, fragile states

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .