Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
John Locke and Natural Philosophy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Peter R. Anstey

Print publication date: 2011

Print ISBN-13: 9780199589777

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2011

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589777.001.0001

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy).date: 01 December 2015


(p.153) 8 Explanation
John Locke and Natural Philosophy

Peter R. Anstey (Contributor Webpage)

Oxford University Press

This chapter argues that, on the whole, Locke adheres to the principles of explanation and constraints on explanation that were typical of proponents of the mechanical philosophy and the corpuscular theory of matter. The chapter concludes by showing that there is little place for laws of nature in Locke's views on explanation in natural philosophy and that he did not incorporate Newton's notion of principles of natural philosophy into the Essay.

Keywords:   Boyle, contact criterion, Descartes, Familiarity Condition, intelligibility, laws of nature, Newton, reduction, simple ideas, superaddition

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .