APPLICATIONS OF INDUCTIVE DEFINITIONS AND CHOICE PRINCIPLES TO PROGRAM SYNTHESIS
This chapter is concerned with the problem of finding constructive content in nonconstructive mathematical theorems. By so doing, one gains insight into possible constructive aspects hidden in classical theorems. It describes — in a nontechnical way — how these aspects can be brought to light and computationally exploited. It describes two methods of extracting constructive content from classical proofs, focusing on theorems involving infinite sequences and nonconstructive choice principles. The first method removes any reference to infinite sequences and transforms the theorem into a system of inductive definitions, the other applies a combination of Gödel's negative- and Friedman's A-translation. Both approaches are explained by means of a case study on Higman's Lemma and its well-known classical proof due to Nash-Williams. It also discusses some proof-theoretic optimizations that were crucial for the formalization and implementation of this work in the interactive proof system Minlog.
Keywords: program extraction, inductive definitions, choice principles, constructive content, Gödel's negative-translation, Friedman's A-translation, Higman Lemma, Minlog
Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .