Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Hearing Bach's Passions$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Daniel R. Melamed

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9780195169331

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2010

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169331.001.0001

Bach/Not Bach: The Anonymous St. Luke Passion BWV 246

How did an anonymous passion come to be attributed to Bach, and what does it mean that it did?

Chapter:
(p. 111 ) seven Bach/Not Bach: The Anonymous St. Luke Passion BWV 246
Source:
Hearing Bach's Passions
Author(s):

Daniel R. Melamed

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195169331.003.07

How did an anonymous passion come to be attributed to Bach, and what does it mean that it did? The St. Luke Passion BWV 246 sets Luke's words as a biblical oratorio with interpolated poetic arias and chorales, just like Bach's other passions. Everyone now agrees that the passion is not by Bach, but the work is still known today because, even after scholars gave up on the idea that the work was his, they clung to the problematic claim that he had performed the piece as part of his working repertory in Leipzig. The St. Luke Passion illustrates one of the most serious problems in the study of old music, and offers some discomforting insights into the assumptions we make about Great Musical Works and their composers.

Keywords:   Leipzig, passion, St. Luke Passion, attribution

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .