Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Aristotle on Meaning and Essence$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

David Charles

Print publication date: 2002

Print ISBN-13: 9780199256730

Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003

DOI: 10.1093/019925673X.001.0001

Demonstration and Definition: Aristotle's Positive Views in Posterior Analytics Β.8–10 and Β.16–18

Chapter:
(p. 197 ) 8 Demonstration and Definition: Aristotle's Positive Views in Posterior Analytics Β.8–10 and Β.16–18
Source:
Aristotle on Meaning and Essence
Author(s):

David Charles (Contributor Webpage)

Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:10.1093/019925673X.003.0009

Aristotle seeks to resolve the problems raised in Posterior Analytics B.3–7 by arguing that our practices of definition and explanation are interdependent. It is not possible to define kinds without appeal to their causal structure, nor is it possible to single out the relevant causal structure without appeal to what is required for good definition. This is why Aristotle holds that the answer to the questions, ‘What is F?’ and ‘Why is F as it is?’ are the same. Neither definition nor explanation can be completed without assistance from the other.

Keywords:   Aristotle, definition, demonstration, explanation, natural kinds, Posterior Analytics

Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs , and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .