|
Stern, Sacha
Senior Lecturer and Head of Department, The London School of Jewish Studies
Print publication date: 2001 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003 Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-827034-8 |
|
|
doi:10.1093/0198270348.003.0003
Abstract: The month in Jewish lunar calendars usually began when the new moon crescent was first sighted, as evident from Philo, Josephus, and other literary and epigraphic sources (e.g. the Berenike inscriptions—rabbinic sources are dealt with in the next chapter). From the fourth century c.e., however, some Jewish calendars appear to have begun the month on the day of conjunction (thus about two days earlier), as evident from the document of the Council of Sardica, the Catania inscription, and the ketubah of Antinoopolis. These calendars were not empirically determined, but based on fixed, calculated schemes. Diversity of practice appears to have persisted, nevertheless, until the end of antiquity (as evident, for instance, from the Zoar inscriptions).
Keywords: Antinoopolis, Berenike, calculation, Catania, conjunction, diversity, Josephus, new moon, Philo, Sardica, Zoar,
|
|
|
|
|