Losers' Consent
Elections and Democratic Legitimacy
Anderson, Christopher J. Department of Political Science, Syracuse University
Blais, André Department of Political Science, University of Montreal
Bowler, Shaun Department of Political Science, University of California, Riverside
Donovan, Todd Department of Political Science, Western Washington University
Listhaug, Ola Department of Sociology and Political Science, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Print publication date: 2005 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: July 2005
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-927638-7
doi:10.1093/0199276382.003.0001
Christopher J. Anderson
André Blais
Shaun Bowler
Todd Donovan
Ola Listhaug
Provides an overview of the argument. Describes how elections produce unequal outcomes—for some to win, others have to lose. Also highlights the importance of losers’ consent for understanding political legitimacy. Losers’ consent is critical for democratic systems to function because losers are numerous; in part, it is important because of the incentives that losing creates. Also describes examples of graceful and sore losers in various countries around the world. Concludes by providing an alternative view of elections as institutional mechanisms that can enhance or diminish the legitimacy of political systems.
Keywords: Al Gore, consent, democracy, election outcomes, elections, legitimacy, losers, political behaviour, voting, winners,
doi:10.1093/0199276382.003.0001
Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
PART I THE WINNER–LOSER GAP
PART II UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENCES IN LOSERS' CONSENT