|
Anderson, Christopher J.
Department of Political Science, Syracuse University
Blais, André
Department of Political Science, University of Montreal
Bowler, Shaun
Department of Political Science, University of California, Riverside
Donovan, Todd
Department of Political Science, Western Washington University
Listhaug, Ola
Department of Sociology and Political Science, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Print publication date: 2005 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: July 2005 Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-927638-7 doi:10.1093/0199276382.003.0001 |
|
|
Provides an overview of the argument. Describes how elections produce unequal outcomes—for some to win, others have to lose. Also highlights the importance of losers’ consent for understanding political legitimacy. Losers’ consent is critical for democratic systems to function because losers are numerous; in part, it is important because of the incentives that losing creates. Also describes examples of graceful and sore losers in various countries around the world. Concludes by providing an alternative view of elections as institutional mechanisms that can enhance or diminish the legitimacy of political systems.
Keywords: Al Gore, consent, democracy, election outcomes, elections, legitimacy, losers, political behaviour, voting, winners,
doi:10.1093/0199276382.003.0001
|
|