Mixed-Member Electoral Systems
The Best of Both Worlds?
Shugart, Matthew Soberg University of California, San Diego
Wattenberg, Martin P. University of California, Irvine
Print publication date: 2003 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-925768-3







doi:10.1093/019925768X.003.0009

Brian F. Crisp
Juan Carlos Rey
Abstract: Recent electoral reform in Venezuela, including the adoption of a mixed-member proportional (MMP) system, has occurred in the context of crisis. Recounts the history leading from the situation of an extreme electoral system with a very dominant party leadership (a hyper-centralized system) to the adoption of the MMP system in 1993—in which it was hoped that legislators would be more accountable to voters in the newly created single-seat geographic constituencies; the system adopted is described as the result of compromise. The first section describes the electoral system and how it has evolved, emphasizing issues of ‘electoral efficiency’. The next section analyzes the reform process and the role/motivations of various actors in the move to an MMP system. With these historical data in hand, the chapter concludes by putting the system for electing congress in the context of wider systemic, institutional issues.

Keywords: electoral history, electoral reform, electoral systems, extreme electoral systems, hyper-centralized systems, mixed-member electoral systems, mixed-member proportional systems, single-seat districts, Venezuela,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Placing Mixed-Member Systems in the World of Electoral Systems
Part II Origins of Mixed-Member Systems
Part III Consequences of Mixed-Member Systems
Part IV Prospects for Reform in Other Countries