The Politics of Memory and Democratization
Brito, Alexandra Barahona De (Editor),
FLAD Visiting Fellow at the Center of International Studies,
Princeton University
Gonzalez Enriquez, Carmen (Editor),
Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science,
Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (UNED)
Aguilar, Paloma (Editor),
Department of Political Science,
Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (Madrid, Spain)
Print publication date: 2001
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003 Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-924090-6 doi:10.1093/0199240906.001.0001 |
|
|
Abstract:
The book explores how new democracies face an authoritarian past and past human rights violations, and the way in which policies of truth and justice shape the process of democratization. Eighteen countries in Central and South America, Central, Eastern and South Europe and South Africa are analysed in detail. The main variables affecting the implementation of truth and justice policies (purges, truth commissions and trials, among other policies) are: the balance between old and new regime forces; the availability of institutional, human and financial resources, the nature of the ideological preferences and commitments of the elites in question; the mobilization of social groups pressing in favour of these policies; and the importance of human rights in the international arena. The duration and degree of institutionalization of dictatorship is also important. A prolonged dictatorship makes it harder for a new democracy to implement truth and justice policies, particularly when repression occurred in the distant past and if repression gained social complicity. The magnitude and methods of repression used against opposition forces in the dictatorship also shape transitional truth and justice: torture, assassination, and disappearances and clandestine repression in general (as in Central and South America, South Africa) require a different response to official institutionalized ‘softer’ repression (as in Portugal, Spain and Eastern Europe). The findings indicate that, with hindsight, there appears to be no direct relation between the implementation of policies of backward-looking truth and justice and the quality of new democracies. Democracy is just as strong and deep in Spain, Hungary and Uruguay, where there was no punishment or truth telling, as it is in Portugal, the Czech Republic or Argentina, which experienced purges and trials. However, such policies are justified not merely on instrumental grounds, but also for ethical reasons, and they symbolize a break with a violent, undemocratic past.
Keywords: assassination, Central America, Central Europe, democracy, democratization, democratizing societies, dictatorship, disappearances, Eastern Europe, human rights, justice policies, new democracies, punishment, purges, repression, South Africa, South America, South Europe, torture, transitional justice, trials, truth and justice policies, truth commissions, truth telling Table of Contents
Introduction
1.
The Role of International Actors in National Accountability Processes
2.
Settling Accounts With the Past in a Troubled Transition to Democracy: The Portuguese Case
3.
Justice, Politics, and Memory in the Spanish Transition
4.
Truth, Justice, Memory, and Democratization in the Southern Cone
5.
War, Peace, and Memory Politics in Central America *
6.
Justice and Legitimacy in the South African Transition
7.
De-Communization and Political Justice in Central and Eastern Europe
8.
East Germany: Incorporation, Tainted Truth, and the Double Division
9.
In Search of Identity: The Collapse of the Soviet Union and the Recreation of Russia
Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
|
|
|
|
|