Edwards III, George C Distinguished Professor of Political Science, Texas A&M University
King, Desmond Andrew W. Mellon Professor of American Government and Professorial Fellow, University of Oxford
Print publication date: 2007 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2007
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-921797-7
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217977.003.0008
 

Gary C. Jacobson
This chapter reviews a selection of polling data on the president and the war to document the unprecedented partisan polarization in public attitudes these have jointly provoked, and to begin to explore some of the questions the data can be used to address concerning the formation, evolution, and consequences of mass opinion on the war. The public's unusually wide partisan divisions over evaluations of President Bush and his decision to force a regime change in Iraq are closely connected. Among Republicans of all stripes, but especially Christian conservatives, initial high regard for the president and trust in his honesty encouraged acceptance of his original case for war. When its premises proved faulty, they either missed that story or decided it was irrelevant and continued to support the war, accepting the administration's claim that it was integral to the war on terrorism and thus to the security of the US. Democrats tended to neither trust Bush nor appreciate his performance as president, so their support for the war depended crucially on belief in its necessity.
Keywords: Bush Administration, war, Iraq, polling data, Republications, Democrats, Christian conservatives, polarization, partisan division
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217977.003.0008
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I
Part II Decision Making
Part III
Part IV Building Congressional Coalitions