Clausewitz's Puzzle
The Political Theory of War
Herberg-Rothe, Andreas Private Lecturer, Institute for Social Sciences, Humboldt-University Berlin
Print publication date: 2007 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2007
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-920269-0







doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199202690.003.0006

Andreas Herberg-Rothe
Abstract: Clausewitz intended at the end of his life to write a different chapter on polarity in which he would have disclosed the secret of his method, as Raymond Aron saw it. But this secret is not hidden in the concept of polarity itself, but within what Clausewitz called the ‘true logical antithesis’ of defence and attack. Clausewitz's proposition, ‘that defense is the stronger form of fighting with the negative purpose, attack the weaker form with the positive purpose’ reveals the true secret of his method. By differentiating this proposition, many transitions and intersections between these contrasts are exposed, which enables the formulation of a particular, Clausewitzian sort of dialectic. With the help of Clausewitz's treatment of the ‘true logical antithesis’ of defence and attack, we are able to validate that his different conceptualizations of war are really antithetical tendencies in every war.

Keywords: defence, attack, stronger form, negative purpose, weaker form, positive purpose, dialectics, true logical antithesis,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Prologue
Part II Antitheses and Ambivalences
Part III Using Clausewitz to Go Beyond Clausewitz