Clausewitz's Puzzle
The Political Theory of War
Herberg-Rothe, Andreas Private Lecturer, Institute for Social Sciences, Humboldt-University Berlin
Print publication date: 2007 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2007
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-920269-0







doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199202690.003.0004

Andreas Herberg-Rothe
Abstract: All previous interpretations of Clausewitz's concept of war have treated it as something that must be understood in connection with the three interactions to the extreme, and consequently with his concept of the absolute. This chapter discusses the similarities and the difference between Clausewitz's concept of absolute war and modern total war. Furthermore, it can be shown that the different conceptualizations of Clausewitz's concepts of war are connected with his different war experiences at Jena, Moscow, and Waterloo. Until now, it has been overlooked that Clausewitz also speaks of the wondrous trinity as his concept of war. Nevertheless, it has to be acknowledged that Clausewitz's conceptualizations remain ambivalent without a discrete interpretation of his first chapter.

Keywords: total war, different conceptualizations, Jena, Moscow, Waterloo, contradictions in terms,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Prologue
Part II Antitheses and Ambivalences
Part III Using Clausewitz to Go Beyond Clausewitz