European Integration After Amsterdam
Institutional Dynamics and Prospects for Democracy
Neunreither, Karlheinz Professor of Political Sciene, University of Heidelberg
Wiener, Antje Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Hannover
Print publication date: 2000 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-829640-9







doi:10.1093/0198296401.003.0014

Mark A. Pollack
Abstract: The EU's founding Treaties have been characterized by political contestation along two dimensions: a centre-periphery dimension in which centralization to Brussels is opposed to national sovereignty, and a left-right dimension pitting a center-right project of market liberalization against a center-left project of ‘regulated capitalism’. From the Treaty of Rome through the Maastricht Treaty, the fundamental thrust of the treaties has been neoliberal, focusing on the creation of a unified European marketplace, while side agreements have secured some elements of the regulated capitalism project. In this context, the Treaty of Amsterdam represents an outlier: a Treaty that addresses the central concerns of the regulated capitalism model (e.g. employment, social policy, and the environment), but does so primarily through new regulatory instruments and comparison of best practices rather than binding EU regulations. For good or ill, this ‘Blairite Treaty’ reflects the ‘Third Way’ governing philosophy of British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

Keywords: Amsterdam Treaty, best practice, centralization, market liberalization, national sovereignty, neoliberalism, regulated capitalism, regulation, Third Way, Tony Blair,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Changing Institutions
Part II Prospects for Democracy
Part III Flexibility and the Challenge of Enlargement
Part IV Theoretical Perspectives on Constitutional Change