Debating Democracy's Discontent
Essays on American Politics, Law, and Public Philosophy
Allen, Anita L. Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Research and Scholarship
Regan, Milton C. JrProfessor of Law, both at the Georgetown University Law Center
Print publication date: 1998 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-829496-2







doi:10.1093/0198294964.003.0023

Milton C. Regan , Jr.
Abstract: The Supreme Court in Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce upheld the application to the Michigan Chamber of Commerce, a nonprofit corporation funded by dues from members, three-quarters of whom are business corporations, of a Michigan law that forbids non-media corporations from using corporate treasury funds to make independent expenditures in connection with state elections for public office. The decision in Austin can be seen as resting on the view that business corporations are constrained in ways that systematically preclude them from cultivating civic virtue. Ironically, despite its often enormous wealth, the corporation is a paradigm of the materially dependent actor that has no choice but to look relentlessly to its self-interest. The modern corporation is operated for the sake of fictional shareholders, who are assumed to care only about maximizing the financial value of their shares, but, given the increasingly broad ownership of shares, shareholders also may well be employees of the company in which they hold stock or members of a community in which the corporation is an important economic presence. Union activity represents an effort at self-governance in the workplace, which requires consideration of and trade-offs among a variety of both material and nonmaterial goods.

Keywords: Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, corporations, dependent, elections, fictional, funds, material, nonmaterial, shareholders, union,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
I Reviving Civic Virtue
II Toward an American Public Philosophy
III Liberal Republicanism
IV Living With Difference
V Law, Morals, and Private Lives
VI Self-Government and Democratic Discontent
VII A Reply to His Critics