|
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall
Professor of Communication and Walter H. Annenberg Dean
Waldman, Paul
Postdoctoral Fellow, both at the Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania
Print publication date: 2002 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003 Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-515277-7 |
|
|
doi:10.1093/0195152778.003.0003
Abstract: In the 2000 election, journalists settled on twin portraits of Al Gore and George W. Bush that framed the coverage each received. Gore was portrayed as the lying panderer, while Bush was portrayed as the inexperienced dolt. These portraits then determined how campaign events were interpreted. While neither portrait was complimentary, in the end they worked to Bush's advantage, because no moral value was attached to inexperience, while a moral value was attached to Gore's alleged dishonesty.
Keywords: 2000 election, George W. Bush, campaign news, framing, Al Gore, journalism, moral value, presidential candidates,
|
|
|
|
|