Gidron, Benjamin
Director, Israeli Center for Third Sector Research, and Professor, Spitzer Department of Social Work, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva
Katz, Stanley N.
Lecturer and Professor, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University
Hasenfeld, Yeheskel
Professor of Social Welfare, UCLA School of Public Policy
Print publication date: 2002 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online:
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-512592-4
doi:10.1093/0195125924.003.0008
Megan Meyer
Most peace and conflict-resolution organizations (P/CROs) were founded between 1980 and 1990, in response to heightened conflict in their regions; charismatic leaders – usually highly educated and politically astute – and local networks played instrumental roles. Most P/CROs relied on international funding. South African P/CROs received funding from foreign governments, international multilateral agencies, and religious institutions, Israeli/Palestinian P/CROs from private foreign donors and foundations, and Northern Irish P/CROs mainly from the UK and the European Union. All P/CROs used a variety of tactics, but emphasized a package of tactics that fit their members’ beliefs, interests, and skills; there was only slight variation in tactics across regions, but political context did play a small role in determining “tastes in tactics.” Almost all P/CROs, whatever their initial aspirations, became somewhat formalized as they aged. P/CROs in Northern Ireland tended to frame the conflict in terms of personal attitudes; in South Africa and Israel/Palestine, P/CRO frames emphasized systemic factors.
Keywords: charismatic leaders,
frame,
heightened conflict,
international funding,
Israel/Palestine,
local networks,
Northern Ireland,
peace and conflict-resolution organizations (P/CROs),
South Africa,
tactics
doi:10.1093/0195125924.003.0008