Gidron, Benjamin
Director, Israeli Center for Third Sector Research, and Professor, Spitzer Department of Social Work, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva
Katz, Stanley N.
Lecturer and Professor, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University
Hasenfeld, Yeheskel
Professor of Social Welfare, UCLA School of Public Policy
Print publication date: 2002 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online:
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-512592-4
doi:10.1093/0195125924.003.0005
Tamar Hermann
In the late 1960s, and especially after the 1973 war, peace and conflict-resolution organizations (P/CROs) concerned to resolving the Arab–Israeli conflict, peacefully began to emerge in Israel, and in the 1980s, P/CROs became an integral, although mainly unpopular part of Israeli political life. P/CROs’ activities included consciousness raising and protest, dialog promotion, some professional service provision, and the articulation of propeace arguments. Discord amongst P/CROs over the Oslo Accords of 1993, and the conservative turn taken by the Israeli government and society after Rabin's assassination, left Israeli P/CROs weak and ineffectual by the mid 1990s. Furthermore, they had always been hamstrung by the public's perception of the P/CRO political agenda as naïve and idealistic, by their extraparliamentary status in a country that prioritized parliamentary politics, and by their homogeneous membership – older, middle class, highly educated, urban, secular Ashkenazi Jews, many of them born in the USA. While the Israeli government ultimately took advantage of the propeace attitude fostered by the P/CROs and adopted much of the program advocated by P/CROs, it consistently denied them any credit for or role in the peace process.
Keywords: extraparliamentary status,
homogeneous membership,
Israel,
Oslo Accords,
P/CRO activities,
P/CRO political agenda,
peace and conflict-resolution organizations (P/CROs),
Rabin's assassination
doi:10.1093/0195125924.003.0005