Maieusis
Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat
Scott, Dominic
University of Cambridge
Print publication date: 2007 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2008
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-928997-4
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289974.003.0007
Dominic Scott
The philosopher and the tyrant of the
Republic seem worlds apart from one another — the one just, ordered, and harmonious; the other lawless, bestial, and wild. And yet they have one thing in common: both are gripped by an obsessive
er
s. At various points in book VI, philosophers are described as lovers, whether of learning, truth, or philosophy itself (485b1, 490b1-7, 499c1-2, and 501d2). According to the channel analogy of 485a-487a, their philosophical
er
s is like a flow of water directed into a single stream, drying up their other desires for more worldly goods. But the channel argument also applies very well to the tyrant, described not just as lawless, but also as having an
er
s that he pursues with complete single-mindedness, an
er
s that informs all aspects of his character, dominating his beliefs, desires, and actions. This chapter begins with a description of the tyrant in book IX, focusing on the exact reason why Plato characterizes him in terms of
er
s. It then turns to the philosopher and examines passages from the central books of the
Republic that help to reveal the strand linking philosophical and tyrannical
er
s.
Keywords: philosopher,
tyrant,
Republic,
er
s,
Plato
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289974.003.0007