Gaynesford, Maximilian de College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia
Print publication date: 2006 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online:
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-928782-6
doi:10.1093/0199287821.003.0006
 

Maximilian de Gaynesford
‘Purism’, the claim that I is a pure indexical, is a contradictory position which requires the truth of three doctrines that have been shown to be myths: ‘rule theory’, ‘independence’, and ‘the guarantee’. A rash craving for simplicity explains its almost-universal support. ‘Purism’ is false for reasons that create a presumption in favour of a sharply diverging conception: that I is a deictic term. Thus, it is now necessary to establish what a ‘deictic term’ is, and whether I counts as one.
Keywords: purism, rule theory, independence, the guarantee, pure indexical, deictic term, simplicity
doi:10.1093/0199287821.003.0006
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
PART I Questions about the Meaning of I
PART II THE MEANING OF I