Home > Subject index > Philosophy > Table of contents
Subject: Philosophy  Book Title: Against Coherence
Against Coherence
Truth, Probability, and Justification
Olsson, Erik J. , University of Lund, Sweden
Print publication date: 2005
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: July 2005
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-927999-9
doi:10.1093/0199279993.001.0001
 
Abstract: According to the popular coherence theory of knowledge and justification, if a person's beliefs are coherent, they are also likely to be true. This book is the most extensive and detailed study of coherence and probability to date. The book takes the reader through much of the history of the subject, from early theorists like A. C. Ewing and C. I. Lewis to contemporary figures like Laurence BonJour and C. A. J. Coady. The arguments presented are general enough to cover coherence between any items of information, including those deriving from belief, memory, or testimony. It is argued that coherence does not play the positive role that it is generally ascribed in the process whereby beliefs are acquired. The opposite of coherence, incoherence, is nonetheless the driving force in the process whereby beliefs are retracted.

Keywords: belief, belief acquisition, coherence, incoherence, justification, knowledge, memory, probability, testimony, truth
Table of Contents
Preface
You have access to the full text for this item.
1. Introduction
You have access to the abstract and full text for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.
2. Coherence, Truth, and Testimony
You have access to the abstract and full text for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.
3. C. I. Lewis's Radical Justification of Memory
You have access to the abstract and full text for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.
4. Laurence BonJour's Radical Justification of Belief
You have access to the abstract and full text for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.
5. C. A. J. Coady's Radical Justification of Natural Testimony
You have access to the abstract and full text for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.
6. Making the Question Precise
You have access to the abstract and full text for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.
7. A Negative Answer
You have access to the abstract and full text for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.
8. How not to Regain the Truth Connection: A Reply to Bovens and Hartmann
You have access to the abstract and full text for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.
9. Other Coherence Theories
You have access to the abstract and full text for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.
10. Pragmatism, Doubt, and the Role of Incoherence
You have access to the abstract and full text for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.
Appendix
You have access to the full text for this item.
Bibliography
You have access to the full text for this item.
Index
You have access to the full text for this item.
doi:10.1093/0199279993.001.0001
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Does Coherence Imply Truth?
Part II Does More Coherence Imply Higher Likelihood of Truth?
Part III Other Views
Part IV Scepticism and Incoherence