|
McGinn, Colin
Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Jersey
Print publication date: 2004 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2005 Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-926760-6 doi:10.1093/019926760X.003.0010 |
|
|
It is often assumed that mental states must be known introspectively just as material objects must be known perceptually, and that this mode of knowing is especially authoritative; this chapter controverts this assumption. It is argued that a subject might introspect physical facts and perceive mental ones; and that a strong conception of the first-person authority of introspection – non-criterial, non-inferential, direct, infallible, incorrigible, certain – might apply instead to perception. The implications of the logical possibility of such an inverted subject for scepticism and the mind-body problem are discussed. The tension between the view of this chapter, which would make it possible for a subject to have a concept of pain without having introspective acquaintance with it, and the view that this is impossible is discussed.
Keywords: first-person authority, introspection, mind-body problem, perception, scepticism,
doi:10.1093/019926760X.003.0010
|
|