McGinn, Colin Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, New Jersey
Print publication date: 2004 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January 2005
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-926760-6
doi:10.1093/019926760X.003.0010
Colin McGinn
It is often assumed that mental states must be known introspectively just as material objects must be known perceptually, and that this mode of knowing is especially authoritative; this chapter controverts this assumption. It is argued that a subject might introspect physical facts and perceive mental ones; and that a strong conception of the first-person authority of introspection – non-criterial, non-inferential, direct, infallible, incorrigible, certain – might apply instead to perception. The implications of the logical possibility of such an inverted subject for scepticism and the mind-body problem are discussed. The tension between the view of this chapter, which would make it possible for a subject to have a concept of pain without having introspective acquaintance with it, and the view that this is impossible is discussed.
Keywords: first-person authority, introspection, mind-body problem, perception, scepticism,
doi:10.1093/019926760X.003.0010
Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast