Ways a World Might Be
Metaphysical and Anti-Metaphysical Essays
Stalnaker, Robert C. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Print publication date: 2003 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: April 2005
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-925148-3
doi:10.1093/0199251487.003.0013
Robert C. Stalnaker
Sydney Shoemaker has reconciled a broadly functionalist and materialist conception of the mind with what he calls “the common-sense view” of the inverted spectrum. This paper explores Shoemaker’s articulation and defence of the common sense view, and the conception of the content of qualitative experience the lies behind it. It examines the Frege-Schlick view, and a counterargument (Shoemaker’s paradox) that Shoemaker uses to raise a prima facie problem for the view he is defending. It is argued that when Shoemaker’s account of qualia is developed in response to the paradox, it loses its intuitive appeal and its claim on the label “common-sense view”.
Keywords: Sydney Shoemaker, common-sense view, qualia, inverted spectrum, Frege-Schlick view,
doi:10.1093/0199251487.003.0013
Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part1 Ways and Worlds
Part II Carving up Logical Space
Part III Identity in and across Possible Worlds
Part IV Semantics, Metasemantics, and Metaphysics
Part V Subjective Possibilities