Coope, Ursula Birkbeck College, University of London
Print publication date: 2005 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online:
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-924790-5
doi:10.1093/0199247900.003.0003
 

Ursula Coope
This chapter begins with a discusion of Aristotle’s two reasons for saying that time cannot be a kind of change: time is universal in a way that change is not, and changes are fast or slow, whereas time is not. It then examines Aristotle’s defence of the claim that time should be defined partly in terms of change. It argues that Aristotle is presupposing the truth of certain assumptions made in ordinary life about the relation between time and change. It is assumed that there is time when and only when there is change. Aristotle thinks there is good prima facie reason for supposing that common assumptions of this kind are true, and hence, for thinking that time is something essentially related to change.
Keywords: change, common assumptions
doi:10.1093/0199247900.003.0003
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
PART I INTRODUCTORY PUZZLES AND THE STARTING POINTS OF INQUIRY
PART II TIME'S DEPENDENCE ON CHANGE
PART III TIME AS A NUMBER AND TIME AS A MEASURE
PART IV THE SAMENESS AND DIFFERENCE OF TIMES AND NOWS
PART V TWO CONSEQUENCES OF ARISTOTLE'S ACCOUNT OF TIME