|
Russell, Gillian
Washington University in St Louis
Print publication date: 2008 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2008 Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-923219-2 |
|
|
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232192.003.0007
Abstract: This chapter responds to some further arguments against analyticity, including the Regress Argument, arguments based on the widespread phenomenon of vagueness, arguments from semantic externalism and scepticism about meaning and arguments based on individual sentences, such as ‘all cats are animals’ and ‘gold is yellow’.
Keywords: regress argument, rules of implication, indeterminacy of translation, underdetermination, semantic externalism, vagueness, scepticism,
|
|
|
|
|