Disjunctivism
Perception, Action, Knowledge
Haddock, Adrian University of Stirling
Macpherson, Fiona University of Glasgow
Print publication date: 2008 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2008
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-923154-6
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.003.0009
 

Susanna Siegel
Since disjunctivists when talking about perception deny that hallucinations and veridical perceptions have a common fundamental nature, they need some other way to account for the fact that these kinds of experiences can ‘seem the same’ from the inside. A natural response is to give a purely epistemic account of hallucination, according to which there is nothing more to hallucinations than their indiscriminability from veridical perceptions. This chapter argues that the epistemic conception of hallucination falters in its treatment of cognitively unsophisticated creatures, and that it cannot respect all the facts about what we can know on the basis of introspection.
Keywords: disjunctivism, perception, veridical, experience, epistemology, introspection
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.003.0009
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Perception
Part II Action
Part III Knowledgement