Disjunctivism
Perception, Action, Knowledge
Haddock, Adrian University of Stirling
Macpherson, Fiona University of Glasgow
Print publication date: 2008 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2008
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-923154-6
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.003.0002
 

Paul Snowdon
This chapter investigates the central argument of Hinton's book Experiences. Hinton is credited with being the originator of disjunctivism, but his own writings are neglected. It is suggested that the idea of disjunctivism pre-dates Hinton's writings, but his achievement was being the first to focus on perception-illusion disjunctions, and to employ that kind of statement in an argument against a certain view of experience. It is argued that his account of them is not open to some objections that have been brought in the past, but it remains, in some respects, questionable. His main employment of them in an argument against the common element hypothesis is also questionable, but it is argued that he is right to object to that hypothesis on one central conception of it. It is hard to determine what his attitude is to that hypothesis on another conception, and that uncertainty represents the main mystery about his view.
Keywords: experience, perception, illusion, disjunctivism, common element hypothesis
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.003.0002
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Perception
Part II Action
Part III Knowledgement