Bourne, Craig Pembroke College, Cambridge
Print publication date: 2006 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online:
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-921280-4
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199212804.003.0009
 

Craig Bourne
I discuss Gödel's philosophical position on the nature of time. I describe Gödel's model, which contains closed time-like curves allowing us to take a journey into our future and arrive in our past, and show how it is incompatible with presentism. I do not discuss the well-known implications of this for time travel, but focus on Gödel's subtler ‘modal’ argument. I discuss various ways of rejecting this argument and show that the conclusion that presentists must draw is that tense is not an essential feature of it: whether time is presentist or tenseless is an entirely contingent matter. I conclude by considering the extent to which metaphysics can tell us about the nature of time as it actually is.
Keywords: Gödel, Einstein, general relativity, closed time-like curves, modal argument, presentism, essential properties, contingent metaphysics
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199212804.003.0009
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I The Presentist Manifesto
Part II Presentism and Relativity