Revelation
From Metaphor to Analogy
Swinburne, Richard Emeritus Nolloth Professor of the Philosophy of the Christian Religion, University of Oxford; Fellow of the British Academy
Print publication date: 2007 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2007
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-921246-0







doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199212460.003.0011

Richard Swinburne
Abstract: The Bible consists of small units, woven together into ‘books’ which were put together into the two Testaments, which were put together into one Bible. The meaning of the sentences of a unit depends on its context, including the identity of its author. When a unit is put into a book and the book eventually put into one Bible, the meanings of its sentences change since the context changes. The meaning of a sentence regarded as a sentence of the whole Bible depends crucially on who is the author of the whole Bible. If God inspired its compilation, then he is its ultimate author; and in that case passages of the Bible must be understood to have the meaning they would have if he had written it. For example all its sentences must be understood in such a way as to be consistent with each other, and with everything else God knows (for example the truths of science and history, and doctrinal truths certified by the Church). Our only grounds for believing the Bible to contain revealed truth are that the church declared that God authorized it.

Keywords: authorization, context, meaning, the Church, doctrinal truths,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Meaning
Part II Evidence of a Revelation
Part III The Christian Revelation