Ameriks, Karl University of Notre Dame
Print publication date: 2006 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online:
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-920534-9
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199205349.003.0007
 

Karl Ameriks
This chapter combines an analysis of the structure of Kant's critique of earlier metaphysics with a historical account of how this critique could have had as its fate the remarkable rise of a new kind of metaphysics in the era of German Idealism. It begins with the general observation that the Dialectic of the Critique of Pure Reason does not attempt, let alone accomplish, the kind of complete destruction of metaphysics that many of its readers have supposed. Many traditional transcendent metaphysical ideas are allowed to be not only coherent but also assertable, once the demands of regulative and practical reason are allowed to supplement the thoughts of constitutive theoretical reason. Moreover, the Critique's stress on notions such as idealism, things in themselves, and the ‘unconditioned’ created (as William Hamilton noted) a ‘spectre’ that ‘haunted’ and stimulated German Idealism's new metaphysics of the ‘absolute’. Although Kant offers a radical critique of all earlier systems of a spiritualist or materialist kind, he also believes that something metaphysical should be affirmed beyond the spatiotemporal features of our experience. It is argued that for both Kant and German Idealism, this metaphysics is at least not any kind of subjectivism, and it need not present a special threat to most of our common realist beliefs.
Keywords: Kant, metaphysics, Critique of Pure Reason, German Idealism, subjectivism, Dialectic
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199205349.003.0007
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Kant and After
Part II Reinhold and After
Part III Hegel and After
Part IV Contemporary Interpretations