Tooley, Michael Professor of Philosophy, University of Colorado, Boulder
Print publication date: 2000 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-825074-6







doi:10.1093/0198250746.003.0008

Michael Tooley
Abstract: Completes the defence of the claim that tenseless concepts are more basic than tensed ones. It argues for three theses. First, not all tensed statements involve indexicals, and those that do not are analytically more basic. Second, these non-indexical tensed statements can be used to give truth conditions for indexical tensed statements. Third, non-indexical tensed statements can be analysed in terms of tenseless statements together with the concept of what is actual as of, or true at, a given time. In particular, the tensed concept of lying in the present can be analysed following this strategy.

Keywords: analysis, indexicals, present, tensed concepts, tenseless concepts,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Causation, Time, and Ontology
Part II Semantical Issues
Part III Tensed Facts
Part IV Temporal Relations
Part V Objections
Part VI A Summing-Up