Burgess, John P. Professor of Philosophy, Princeton University
Rosen, Gideon Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Princeton University
Print publication date: 1999 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online:
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-825012-8
doi:10.1093/0198250126.003.0005
 

John P. Burgess
Gideon Rosen
Develops a variant of the strategy of the preceding chapter, drawing on ideas of so-called mathematical structuralism, according to which statements about ‘the’ system of real numbers are really statements about all systems of objects and relations of the right kind. A structuralist reading of standard mathematics is no more nominalistically acceptable than a straightforward reading because there generally are not any systems objects and relations of the right kind among the concrete. But the structuralist reading can be modified to make it nominalistically acceptable by bringing in modal logic, and combining it with Leśniewski's mereology and Boolos's plural quantification or both. The end result is a kind of partial vindication of logicism, in that all relevant mathematical assumptions are reduced to assumptions of a grand logic, including modality, mereology, and plural quantification.
Keywords: Boolos, Leśniewski, logicism, mereology, modality, modal logic, plural quantification, structuralism
doi:10.1093/0198250126.003.0005
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Philosophical and Technical Background
Part II Three Major Strategies
Part III Further Strategies and a Provisional Assessment