Swinburne, Richard Nolloth Professor of the Philosophy of the Christian Religion, University of Oxford
Print publication date: 1989 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-824849-1







doi:10.1093/0198248490.003.0007

Richard Swinburne
Abstract: If a wrongdoer does not make reparation, a victim has the right to take reparation from him (of more value than the original loss), which will constitute punishment. Explicitly or implicitly, however, people may hand over their right to punish to the state. Neither the victim nor the state has any obligation to punish, but there are normally good utilitarian reasons for punishing— prevention, deterrence, and reform.

Keywords: deterrence, Kant, Locke, prevention, punishment, reform, victim,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Responsibility
Part II Its Theological Consequences