|
Raz, Joseph
Professor of Philosophy of Law and Fellow of Balliol College, University of Oxford
Print publication date: 1988 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003 Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-824807-1 |
|
|
doi:10.1093/0198248075.003.0015
Abstract: The ideal of autonomy, together with pluralism, underlies the doctrine of political freedom. Autonomy underlies both positive and negative freedom. Toleration is underpinned by the competitive pluralism that is essential to autonomy. Autonomy is consistent with perfectionism, yet also underlies the ‘harm principle’, which asserts that the only purpose for which the law may use its coercive power is to prevent harm. Perfectionism and the harm principle are consistent with one another because the recommended type of perfectionism abjures coercion, focusing instead on maintaining the framework conditions that are conducive for pluralism and autonomy.
Keywords: autonomy, coercion, competitive pluralism, harm principle, perfectionism, toleration,
|
|
|
|
|