|
Sibley, Frank
former Professor of Philosophy, Lancaster University
Benson, John
Professor of Philosophy
Redfern, Betty
Cox, Jeremy Roxbee
all at Lancaster University
Print publication date: 2001 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003 Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-823899-7 |
|
|
doi:10.1093/0198238991.003.0003
Abstract: Sibley distinguishes aesthetic judgements, non-aesthetic judgements, and verdicts. Verdicts are purely evaluative, while the (initially intuitive) distinction between aesthetic and non-aesthetic judgements demarcates, barring expected borderline cases, the subject matter of aesthetics. Chapter 3 is concerned with illuminating this distinction, by outlining how aesthetic judgements are made, justified, and explained. Sibley further disentangles the various, conceptual and contingent, relations and dependences of aesthetic and non-aesthetic judgements, concluding that the truth of aesthetic judgements cannot be verified, confirmed, or supported mechanically or by appeal to rules.
Keywords: aesthetics, dependence, evaluation, Frank Sibley, judgement, rules, truth, verdict,
|
|
|
|
|