Approach to Aesthetics
Collected Papers on Philosophical Aesthetics
Sibley, Frank former Professor of Philosophy, Lancaster University
Benson, John Professor of Philosophy
Redfern, Betty
Cox, Jeremy Roxbee all at Lancaster University
Print publication date: 2001 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-823899-7







doi:10.1093/0198238991.003.0003

Frank Sibley
Abstract: Sibley distinguishes aesthetic judgements, non-aesthetic judgements, and verdicts. Verdicts are purely evaluative, while the (initially intuitive) distinction between aesthetic and non-aesthetic judgements demarcates, barring expected borderline cases, the subject matter of aesthetics. Chapter 3 is concerned with illuminating this distinction, by outlining how aesthetic judgements are made, justified, and explained. Sibley further disentangles the various, conceptual and contingent, relations and dependences of aesthetic and non-aesthetic judgements, concluding that the truth of aesthetic judgements cannot be verified, confirmed, or supported mechanically or by appeal to rules.

Keywords: aesthetics, dependence, evaluation, Frank Sibley, judgement, rules, truth, verdict,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast