Dummett, Michael Emeritus Professor of Philosophy, University of Oxford
Print publication date: 1996 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-823621-4







doi:10.1093/0198236212.003.0007

Michael Dummett
Abstract: There is a contest between the view that the primary function of language is that of an instrument of communication and the view that it is that of a vehicle of thought. But such a dilemma is misconceived. The true opposition is between language as representation and language as activity. The representation picture of language is misleading in so far as it assumes that the representative power can be isolated from other features of language and that it consists in the speaker's being in the correct interior states. That would render understanding completely mysterious, and therefore, we should demand an outward manifestation of understanding expressed in linguistic exchange and other actions.

Keywords: communication, Grice, manifestation challenge, representation, Theory of meaning, P.F. Strawson, Wittgenstein,

You have access to the abstract for this item.     You have access to the full text for this item.



 










Quick Search Form

 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast