Fine, Gail Professor of Philosophy, Cornell University
Print publication date: 1995 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online:
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-823549-1
doi:10.1093/0198235496.003.0006
 

Gail Fine
Aristotle's second objection to the Arguments from the Sciences is that, if it proved the existence of forms, then it would commit one to admitting forms of artefacts; and this is a conclusion undesired by Platonism. Fine raises a difficulty, in that Plato in fact often appears to countenance forms of artefacts; in this chapter, she considers Aristotle's objection and Plato's understanding of the forms of artefacts. Fine argues that, although Plato does countenance forms of artefacts, such forms do not have the features that are associated (by Aristotle, at least) with Platonic forms, strictly speaking. Indeed, Plato himself denies that artefact forms are perfect, separate, or non-sensible. Regarding the objection, then, Fine concludes that it is reasonable, because Aristotle is justified in claiming that the Arguments from the Sciences lead to the existence of artefact forms, and it is a result that Plato may not welcome.
Keywords: Arguments from the Sciences, Aristotle's second objection, forms of artefacts, perfect, Platonic forms, separate
doi:10.1093/0198235496.003.0006
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast