|
Swinburne, Richard
Nolloth Professor of the Philosophy of the Christian Religion, University of Oxford
Print publication date: 1994 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: November 2003 Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-823512-5 |
|
|
doi:10.1093/0198235127.003.0011
Abstract: God does not need to become incarnate, i.e. human, to forgive us, but it is good that he should do so to make his forgiveness available to us by means of an atonement for our sins; and also for many other reasons – to identify with our sufferings, show us how much he loves us, and reveal truths to us. Evidence that Jesus was God Incarnate is provided by the kind of life he led, and its culmination in the Resurrection. Other accounts of the ‘incarnation’ – monophysitism, Nestorianism, the Kenotic Theory, and modern humanistic Christologies – are less probable than the Chalcedonian one. The chapter concludes with a brief discussion of the Virgin Birth, and the Ascension of Christ.
Keywords: Ascension of Christ, Council of Chalcedon, incarnation, Jesus Christ, Kenotic Theory, Macquarrie, J, monophysitism, Nestorianism, virgin birth,
|
|
|
|
|