Rationality and the Good
Critical Essays on the Ethics and Epistemology of Robert Audi
Timmons, Mark Philosophy Department, Arizona State University
Greco, John Philosophy Department, Fordham University
Mele, Alfred Philosophy Department, Florida State University
Print publication date: 2007 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2007
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-531195-2
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311952.003.0011
 

Alston William P.
This chapter argues that Audi's account of nondoxastic propositional faith is inadequate, and that the specifications given by Audi are either in tension with each other or insufficient to specify a distinct propositional attitude. It goes on to offer an account of an attitude what is called ‘acceptance’, whose voluntary character serves to distinguish it from belief. It then argues that acceptance can serve as the “cognitive core” of religious and non-religious faith, and, more specifically, that acceptance without belief is adequate for Christianity. Thus, according to this chapter, acceptance can successfully play the role Audi wishes his nondoxastic faith to play.
Keywords: faith, belief, acceptance, will, religion, christianity
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311952.003.0011
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS FOR INTUITIONIST ETHICS
II KNOWLEDGE, JUSTIFICATION, AND ACCEPTANCE
INTENTION, SELF-DECEPTION, AND REASONS FOR ACTION
IV REASON AND INTUITION IN THOUGHT AND ACTION