Carruthers, Peter Professor of Philosophy, University of Maryland
Laurence, Stephen Philosophy, University of Sheffield
Stich, Stephen Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Rutgers University
Print publication date: 2007 (this edition)
Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: May 2007
Print ISBN-13: 978-0-19-531013-9
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195310139.003.0002
 

Robert Boyd
Peter J. Richerson
Culture has fundamentally changed the nature of human evolution because it creates a novel evolutionary tradeoff. Social learning allows human populations to rapidly evolve accumulate cultural evolution of highly adaptive culturally transmitted behaviors. However, to get the benefits of social learning, humans have to be credulous, for the most part accepting the ways that they observe in their society as sensible and proper; such credulity opens up human minds to the spread of maladaptive beliefs. These costs can be reduced by tinkering with our evolved psychology, but they cannot be eliminated without losing the adaptive benefits of cumulative cultural evolution. The classic nature-nurture controversy neglects the processes of gene-culture coevolution. An evolutionary psychology lacking an account of this fundamental tradeoff cannot successfully explain human evolution.
Keywords: cultural evolution, gene-culture coevolution, nature-nurture controversy, evolutionary psychology, human evolution
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195310139.003.0002
Quick Search Form
 
scroll up fast
scroll up
 
scroll down
scroll down fast
Part I Learning, Culture, and Evolution
Part II Modularity and Cognitive Architecture
Part III Morality, Norms, and Religion